Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf criticized U.S. and Israeli military actions, stating that the recent attacks proved U.S. bases in the region do not protect host countries. He claimed the installations only serve the Tel Aviv regime. This U.S. base threat has raised concerns about regional security and stability.
On his X account, Qalibaf wrote that the U.S.-Israeli assault revealed that the American bases pose threats rather than provide protection. He added that the U.S. sacrifices host countries to benefit Israel and prioritizes Tel Aviv above all. Furthermore, he emphasized that anyone relying on the U.S. remains vulnerable.
The statement comes after a large-scale military strike on Iran on February 28. The attack killed the Leader of the Islamic Revolution, Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei, along with senior military commanders and several civilians. In response, Iran launched waves of retaliatory missile and drone strikes targeting Israeli positions and U.S. bases in the region.
Iran insists it respects neighboring countries’ sovereignty. However, officials argue it has no choice but to defend itself against bases used to launch attacks. Earlier in the day, Iran’s naval forces struck key U.S. base locations, including Al Dhafra, Sheikh Isa, and Al-Udeid.
Experts suggest that this U.S. base threat demonstrates vulnerabilities in regional security strategies. Analysts note that U.S. military presence, once considered a stabilizing factor, may now provoke conflicts rather than prevent them. Moreover, they argue these developments could strain diplomatic ties and impact coalition efforts in West Asia.
Officials warn that the ongoing tension highlights the strategic risks of stationing foreign forces near volatile regions. Furthermore, the strikes may prompt other countries to reconsider alliances and military deployments. Analysts expect heightened alertness across neighboring states as Iran continues retaliatory operations.
Looking ahead, observers say Iran may continue targeting military installations linked to attacks on its territory. Furthermore, political and security analysts indicate that the U.S. bases threat will remain a central discussion in Middle East defense planning. Coordination and verification efforts among regional actors may intensify to reduce misunderstandings and prevent escalation.
The U.S. bases threat underscores a growing divide between military presence and actual regional security. Consequently, countries hosting foreign bases may reevaluate policies, while Iran maintains its stance on self-defense. Meanwhile, Qalibaf’s warnings signal a firm political position in Tehran as regional tensions persist.