Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Baqer Ghalibaf firmly rejected recent diplomatic proposals submitted by American intermediaries during today’s open legislative session. The senior lawmaker declared that maritime access through the strategic Strait of Hormuz will remain strictly blocked. Furthermore, he emphasized that maritime traffic will resume only after Washington fully satisfies seven core conditions outlined previously. These specific requirements stem directly from the bilateral Islamabad Memorandum framework agreement negotiated earlier this year. Consequently, his firm declaration underlines continuing friction between both nations over regional economic and security terms.
Addressing American officials directly, Ghalibaf asserted that one-sided diplomatic demands and stall tactics no longer yield international concessions. As chief negotiator for Iranian talks in Islamabad, he reaffirmed a dual-track strategy combining military readiness with diplomacy. Moreover, he warned that the armed forces maintain total operational readiness while preparing new unexpected tactical surprises. At the same time, diplomatic channels serve primarily to secure national rights and solidify battlefield advantages. Therefore, Iranian defense planners refuse to alter security strategies based on daily foreign media commentary.
The legislative chief explicitly criticized conflicting statements originating from political leaders and media outlets across the United States. Furthermore, he noted that Iranian security policy responds exclusively to tangible foreign actions rather than online rhetoric. This strategic stance follows months of volatile naval operations and heightened regional tensions throughout West Asian waters. Additionally, international energy analysts closely monitor the situation because prolonged maritime disruptions threaten global crude shipments. Thus, market traders anticipate continued price instability until negotiators establish binding maritime security protocols globally.
International mediators plan to facilitate further communications to bridge persistent diplomatic gaps between both sides. However, lawmakers in Tehran insist on verifiable policy adjustments before approving changes to current maritime postures. Iranian military units continue conducting regional defense maneuvers while monitoring international shipping lanes across strategic waterways. Meanwhile, global diplomatic missions urge both governments to exercise restraint and prioritize comprehensive peace talks. Ultimately, achieving lasting regional stability depends on fulfilling mutually agreed framework terms through formal agreements.