Iraq’s Ministry of Communications firmly rejected US claims that Iran network access could result from a new telecom contract. The ministry emphasized that these accusations misrepresented Iraq’s project and ignored its legal safeguards.
The dispute began after Baghdad signed a deal with Muhandis General Company, which operates under the Popular Mobilization Forces. The company will handle the maintenance and expansion of Iraq’s national fiber-optic cable network. However, Washington fears the project could allow Tehran indirect access to Iraq’s communications or enable data monitoring.
Meanwhile, US officials continue to claim that Muhandis General Company collaborates with Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and several Tehran-backed militias. In October, the US Treasury sanctioned the firm, alleging it diverted public funds to support armed groups. Moreover, the United States identified Abu Fadak, a senior PMF commander, as a leading figure in the company.
In response, Iraqi officials strongly denied these allegations. They argued that Muhandis General Company is government-owned and legally qualified to compete for public contracts. Furthermore, the ministry clarified that the project involves only excavation, installation, and maintenance work, not any data access or network control.
Experts say the Iran network access dispute highlights a wider regional power struggle. Tehran continues to deepen its economic and digital partnerships with Iraq, strengthening its influence across vital sectors. Consequently, many analysts see Iraq as both a key market and a bridge for Iran’s regional ambitions.
At the same time, US officials view Tehran’s growing digital reach as a serious threat to Iraq’s independence. Therefore, Washington has repeatedly urged Baghdad to limit Iranian involvement in energy and telecommunications projects.
Nevertheless, Iraqi leaders maintain that their contracts serve national interests and comply with local laws. They argue that Iraq’s infrastructure development depends on practical cooperation rather than foreign political pressure.
Furthermore, telecom experts warn that persistent disputes could slow Iraq’s modernization. Foreign investors may hesitate to participate if political risks remain high. As a result, Iraq’s plans to expand broadband access and improve service quality could face delays.
Despite these concerns, Iraqi authorities reaffirm their commitment to protecting national data and ensuring full operational independence. They plan to continue upgrading telecommunications infrastructure while adhering to international security standards.
Ultimately, the Iran network access issue will remain central in Iraq’s relations with both Washington and Tehran. It underscores the ongoing tension between Iraq’s modernization goals and the geopolitical rivalries shaping the region’s digital future.