Iranian officials have rejected a controversial casualty claim stating that 30,000 people died in recent unrest. Consequently, the foreign ministry called the report false and misleading. Spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei described the allegation as a “Hitler-style big lie” designed to manipulate global public opinion. Moreover, Baghaei posted on social media to counter the casualty claim. He explained that hostile actors attempted to exaggerate events after failing to achieve their goals on the ground. He added that the effort was vicious and aimed at spreading false narratives internationally.
The disputed casualty claim circulated widely in media reports, suggesting deaths over two days of unrest. However, officials argue that these figures are inflated and misrepresent the real situation in Iran. They insist that accurate reporting is critical to prevent misinformation from spreading further. In recent weeks, Iran has faced widespread protests, with clashes between security forces and demonstrators reported in multiple cities. While some reports suggested thousands of casualties, official figures remain far lower. Nevertheless, the government maintains that security measures were necessary to protect civilians and preserve public order.
Experts note that casualty claims can shape international perceptions and influence foreign policy. Inaccurate reporting, therefore, may escalate tensions and affect diplomatic relations. Analysts stress that verifying facts is essential to ensure responsible reporting during periods of unrest. Furthermore, the Iranian foreign ministry emphasized its commitment to providing factual updates. Officials said they would continue countering misinformation and clarifying actual events. Baghaei reiterated that the casualty claim misrepresents reality and could create unnecessary fear and confusion.
Observers warn that exaggerated figures can undermine constructive dialogue and create political pressure. At the same time, Iranian authorities argue that maintaining public trust requires careful communication and transparency about real events. Looking ahead, officials plan to continue issuing verified updates on casualties and security developments. They hope to prevent the spread of false reports while ensuring public safety and stability. Analysts predict that the contested casualty claim will remain a point of debate in global media coverage. Ultimately, the ongoing dispute highlights challenges in monitoring unrest and reporting deaths accurately. Therefore, authorities and experts alike emphasize the importance of reliable information and independent verification to prevent false narratives from spreading.