Threats of violence against Iranian negotiators have drawn sharp condemnation from Tehran. Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baghaei spoke out on Saturday. Specifically, he reacted to U.S. media reports about possible assassinations. These threats emerged during ongoing talks with the United States. The negotiations aim to end U.S.-Israeli aggression against Iran.
Furthermore, Baghaei posted his remarks on social media. He said the threats normalize extortion through violence. “Is this not a policy of extortion through terror?” he asked. In addition, the spokesman warned about public incitement to murder. Consequently, he urged all nations to denounce such state-backed threats.
The Iranian delegation is currently in Islamabad. For context, Pakistan hosts the negotiations between Iran and the U.S. Baghaei himself accompanies the team. He noted that Washington accuses Iran of bad faith. Yet the U.S. media simultaneously issues assassination warnings. Therefore, this contradiction undermines the dialogue process.
The aggression against Iran began in late February. It included killings of senior Iranian political and military leaders. The campaign lasted until a two-week ceasefire last week. Pakistan mediated the truce. According to experts, the U.S. far-right is unhappy with the outcome. They wanted regime change through force. Instead, Washington accepted Iran’s conditions for talks.
Iranian authorities seek compensation for past assassinations. They blame both the U.S. and Israeli governments. The negotiations in Pakistan represent a fragile opportunity. However, threats of violence could derail progress. Baghaei stressed that public incitement to state terrorism must stop. As a result, he called for international legal action.
Political analysts see broader implications. For instance, the U.S. discourse of violent threats sets a dangerous precedent. It encourages extortion as a negotiation tool. Thus, future diplomacy could suffer globally. Small nations may feel less secure. Similarly, businesses might avoid regions with such volatility.
Next steps remain unclear. For now, the talks continue this week in Islamabad. Iran demands written guarantees against further attacks. The U.S. has not responded officially to the threats. Nevertheless, European mediators have expressed concern. They urge both sides to avoid escalation.
Threats of violence now dominate the diplomatic agenda. Without a clear condemnation from Washington, trust erodes quickly. Iran warns it will walk away if intimidation persists. The world watches as two adversaries test fragile ceasefires. Finally, Pakistan works to keep the dialogue alive. Even so, the shadow of assassination threats looms large over any deal.