Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf issued a strong response to recent U.S. warnings over unrest in Iran. He cautioned that, in the event of a U.S. military intervention, Iran could target both Israel and U.S. military and shipping facilities. Analysts view the comments as a significant escalation amid rising tensions with Washington. Ghalibaf’s remarks followed comments by U.S. President Donald Trump, who warned Tehran against violence toward protesters and suggested possible support for Iranian opposition groups. Ghalibaf called Trump “delusional” and stressed that Iran would not limit its defense to reactive measures. He further warned that Washington and its allies should avoid miscalculations that could trigger a wider conflict.
Experts say Ghalibaf’s statement reflects a continuing pattern of heightened threats in the region. Over the past year, Iran has repeatedly warned the U.S. and Israel against military action. Ghalibaf’s latest comments specifically mention the possibility of striking U.S. naval and military infrastructure. Analysts note that such rhetoric raises the risk of miscalculations, particularly in the Persian Gulf. Observers also see the statement as part of Iran’s broader strategic messaging. By referencing both Israel and U.S. maritime assets, Tehran signals its ability to respond beyond its borders. Analysts in Tehran suggest the statement is aimed at reinforcing domestic unity while deterring external intervention.
Recent reports indicate that Iran’s military exercises in the Gulf have increased by more than 30 percent compared to last year. These maneuvers often accompany statements like Ghalibaf’s, serving both practical and symbolic purposes. Regional experts warn that repeated U.S. attack warnings could escalate tensions with global economic implications, especially for energy markets reliant on Gulf shipping lanes. Looking ahead, officials in Washington and Tehran face challenges in reducing tensions. Analysts say careful diplomacy may prevent direct confrontation, but repeated threats increase the risk of accidental engagement. International monitoring of military movements and political messaging will remain crucial in the coming months. Ghalibaf’s statements underline the high stakes of miscalculations. How Washington and Tehran respond could have long-term implications for regional stability and global security.